|










| |
Listed
below are the assigned homework problems. Although these homework problems will NOT be turned in for a grade, you
should expect to see similar problems or these exact problems on tests and
projects. You will be at a great disadvantage when taking tests and
completing projects without doing these homework problems. Partial
answers with R code and output are available for some homework problems.
 | Chapter 1
|
 | Chapter 2
 | 2.2, 2.5, 2.11, 2.12, 2.14 (replace d. with: use R to create a
scatter plot with the estimated regression line, 90% C.I., bands, and
90% P.I. bands), 2.24 (only a.-c., do not do the Table 2.3 part), 2.30,
2.31 (a.-c.), 2.64. |
 | Partial answers |
|
 | Chapter 3
|
 | Chapter 4
 | 4.3 (only b.-c.), 4.7 (only a. and c. using the Bonferroni procedure),
4.27 (only a.-b. and d. using the Bonferroni procedure), and the extra
problem in the partial answers document (data set:
SO2.DAT) |
 | Partial answers |
|
 | Chapter 5
 | 5.4, 5.12, 5.23 |
 | Find the following for the copier maintenance data set (see #1.20)
using matrix methods (do not use lm()): b,
Y^, e, SSTO, SSE, Cov^(b),
95%
C.I. for E(Yh) at Xh=6, and 95% P.I. for Yh(new)
at Xh=6. |
 |
Partial answers |
|
 | Chapter 6
 | 6.15(a.-e., g.)
 | For a: Do box and dot plots instead and include Y |
 | For d: Skip |
 | For e: Use the semi-studentized residuals; do not examine the
two-factor interaction; include a histogram with normal distribution
overlay |
 | For f: Skip |
 | For g: Do Levene's test as well (once for each predictor variable -
there is not a good way to divide the data) |
 | Also, perform the Box-Cox procedure and comment on its results |
 | You may use examine.mod.multiple.R to help answer this problem |
|
 | 6.16, 6.17 |
 | 6.30
 | For a: Do box and dot plots instead |
 | For d.: Also calculate and interpret the adjusted R2 |
 | For e.: Don't do the two factor interaction plots |
 | You may use examine.mod.multiple.R to help answer this problem.
|
 |
Supplementary problems
(download Word file) |
|
 | Partial answers |
|
 | Chapter 7
|
 | Chapter 8
 | 8.38
 | For part a., use examine.mod.multiple.R to examine the model |
 | Also, construct a scatter plot of the data with the second-order
sample model plotted upon it. Use this to help justify your results
in c. |
|
 | 8.40 |
 | 8.41 |
 | Partial answers |
|
 | Chapter 9
 | 9.10
 | For part a., use examine.mod.multiple.R to examine the model |
|
 | 9.11 |
 | 9.18
 | a. Use AIC and hypothesis test methods |
|
 | 9.21
 | The last sentence refers to material in Section 9.5 (wait until this
section to answer the question) |
|
 | 9.25
 | For part a., use examine.mod.multiple.R to examine the model |
 | For part c., see p. 358 for what KNN refers to as "bias" (paragraph
below equation 9.10) |
|
 | Partial
answers |
|
 | Chapter 10
 | 10.7, 10.11, 10.17 |
 | 10.27
 | Use examine.mod.multiple.final.R to help answer the questions |
 | b: You do not need to do the formal normality test |
 | d: Replace the dot plot with the plot created by
examine.mod.multiple.final() |
|
 | 9.27 (model validation problem) |
 | Partial answers |
|
 | Chapter 11
 | Reproduce the example on p. 427-9 of KNN
 | KNN uses my "method #4" for obtaining the weights |
 | Try putting the data into 5 groups to obtain weights also; compare
these results to those obtained by KNN |
|
 | 11.11
 | Instead of b.-e., use LMS and LTS to fit the model and plot it;
compare the estimates to least squares |
|
 | 11.25
 | b: Use a 3D plot instead of a contour plot; examine a full
second-order model as well |
 | c: Use loess() with q = 9/25 |
 | d: Use a 3D plot instead and make sure to put it on the same scale as
in b for comparison purposes |
|
 | Partial answers |
|
|